United states of america Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff – countertop Defendant – Appellee, v. LANIER LAW, LLC, a Florida liability that is limited, d.b.a. Redstone Law Group, d.b.a. Regulations Offices Of Michael W. Lanier, LIBERTY & TRUST LAW SET OF FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida liability that is limited, Defendants – countertop Claimants, MICHAEL W. LANIER, separately so that as an owner, officer, supervisor, and/or agent associated with the above-mentioned entities, Defendant – Counter Claimant – Appellant, FORTRESS LAW GROUP, LLC, a Florida restricted obligation business, et al., Defendants.
This situation calls for us to take into account perhaps the region court precisely granted summary judgment to your Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on its claims that defendant Michael Lanier violated several federal statutes and laws associated with the purchase of home loan support relief services. Lanier contends that the region court must not have awarded summary judgment for all reasons, including that the region court improperly admitted proof against him, overlooked disputes of material reality, and made factual findings in the FTC’s benefit. We conclude that none of those arguments has merit and affirm the region court.
Through Lanier Law, LLC, their lawyer, Michael Lanier, legal counsel located in Jacksonville, Florida, offered mortgage help relief solutions to individuals at risk of losing their homes to foreclosure. 1 Lanier and their affiliates promised homeowners that in return for an upfront charge, he’d negotiate less expensive month-to-month home loan repayments, reduced interest levels, and paid off major balances with the person.